Such Great Heights
At firms big and small, Berkeley Law alumni rise to the leadership challenge.
nna Elento-Sneed ’83 snagged a dream opportunity just a few years after graduating from Berkeley Law: The chance to work at one of the oldest law firms in her native Hawaii.
The labor and employment lawyer jumped at it — only to find the iconic firm too slow and hidebound for her tastes. A second, newer firm still felt stodgy, at least in terms of adopting technologies that could make practice easier and more effective.
“So I decided, ‘Well, I’ll just have to do it,’” Elento-Sneed says. “I took the whole department with me and set up this firm.”
That firm, ES&A, now boasts seven attorneys — including her two daughters — attracting clients with a full suite of services that often range far beyond legal advice. The firm bridges physical distance and belies its small size with various tech tools, from AI analysis of contracts to making the most of virtual and cloud-based connections.
“We’re much more collaborative than the typical law firm, and partner with different professions for large projects to help clients work through things,” Elento-Sneed says. “We ask clients, ‘What do you want? What do you need help with?’ We can bring in non-legal professionals like accountants, PR people, whatever they need to reach their goal.
“It’s a much more dynamic kind of operation and a very different way of practicing law — challenging and always interesting.”
Elento-Sneed didn’t leave Berkeley Law envisioning herself as the head of a firm. But, like other alumni law firm leaders, she’s found deep fulfillment in pushing the boundaries of what firms should look like, do, and aspire to.
Across the country and around the world, Berkeley Law grads are captaining firms through some of the most turbulent waters in decades. Transcript spoke with four of them about how law school guided their path, what it’s like at the top of an organization, and how the turmoil wrought by the COVID-19 pandemic might shape firms of the future.
Changing big law culture, one lawyer at a time
“Leading a law firm, or leading any organization that’s fundamentally talent-driven, is all about creating a sense of purpose, meaning, and connection,” he says. “It’s important that your team knows how that aligns with where they personally want to go. That’s what ultimately, I think, causes people to want to stay at an organization.”
Zuklie says the tumult of the past two years, from the pandemic to America’s racial justice reckoning, has further driven home that how we act matters, as individuals and collectively. He’s tried to push Orrick’s culture in new directions to help clients, staff, and even the legal profession itself.
“We’re really mindful that the current generation of folks in law school are very skeptical about big law and partnership,” he says.
Surveys show roughly a third of law students, and even fewer current associates, want to become a firm partner. To make partnership more attractive, Zuklie says firms must create meaningful experiences for their lawyers, including opportunities to further a balance between their work and home lives — and follow their passions inside their jobs.
Zuklie has also worked to help Orrick, and the profession in general, diversify its ranks. In 2020, Orrick launched its Racial, Social & Economic Justice Fellowship Program, which sends lawyers to work with social justice organizations for a year at their firm salary. Orrick has pledged to fund five fellows in each of the next three years.
Fellow Max Carter-Oberstone, an associate in Orrick’s San Francisco office Supreme Court and Appellate Practice, recently joined the San Francisco Police Commission after a stint at New York University’s Race and Policing Project.
Another partnership, with an alternative legal services provider focused on innovative talent management solutions, aims to expand access to the firm’s ranks.
“If we’re going to change the way our profession looks, we need to find a way to identify talent from a much larger pool — and then make sure we’re investing in that larger pool with resources that enable folks to meet their potential and succeed,” he says. “Every day, we’re rethinking our talent model and trying to learn from what other great firms and other great clients are doing.”
Great litigating makes good business
“Foote was just a legend. I immediately knew I wanted to do criminal litigation, I wanted to be a federal prosecutor, I wanted to try cases,” Rivero says. “And I did everything you could do in law school to get there.”
That included Berkeley Law’s Moot Court team and James Patterson McBaine Honors Moot Court Competition (he was a finalist but still smarts over not winning), an internship in the San Francisco U.S. Attorney’s Office, and a spring break program through the National Institute of Trial Advocacy.
After law school, Rivero thought about staying in California, or moving to New York. But ultimately, he chose to go home to Miami and his Cuban-American roots.
It turned out to be a smart choice: Between drug trafficking and white-collar crime, 1980s Miami was a federal prosecutor’s dream. After a couple years at a big Florida firm, Rivero got his coveted job as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of Florida.
After another round at the big firm, he realized that he still loved trying cases, but wanted to do it in a more streamlined, nimble way. He and a partner opened Rivero Mestre in 1998; the firm now has 20 attorneys in Miami and New York.
“I just love having my own law firm,” Rivero says. “It’s strictly litigation, and I still enjoy it. We just finished a federal jury trial that lasted six weeks, and it’s still as much fun as it was when I was 26.”
Over the years, his firm has built a strong stable of clients in Central America, South America, and Florida. Recently, Rivero Mestre began litigating cryptocurrency cases, including a $600 million suit involving Bitcoin’s inventor that required four years of intense litigation.
“I think the most important thing is knowing what you’re about. That lets you shift rapidly when you need to.”
Rivero Mestre is stocked with Spanish- and Portuguese-speaking lawyers, a big cultural advantage in South Florida and Latin and South America. The firm also tossed the practice of laying out billable hour requirements, which are commonplace at bigger firms.
“I know we’re never going to motivate people with a requirement,” Rivero says. “Without one, we’re really focused on being as efficient as possible for the client.”
With Florida’s regulations potentially changing to allow non-lawyers to run firms, he anticipates another shift in his market. Lean and nimble is a prime position for success, Rivero says — just as smaller animals outlasted the giant creatures of bygone eras.
“I think there will be dinosaurs and there will be rodents,” he says. “I hope to be one of the rodents.”
Designed for maximum impact
“I wanted to make sure we could have true work-life balance,” she says. “We used technology so that if, for example, you needed to stay home because your kid is sick, you could actually just log in from home and work once the kid was asleep. The technology means that we’re not limited to only being in the office.”
The office itself is a Silicon Valley–style plan, with conference rooms for client meetings and more free-flowing “islands” of bench-like stations for the rest of the time. When the pandemic hit, Elento-Sneed says, “all that happened is we went home.”
“It was pretty seamless, because it’s a setup we were already using,” she says. “The flexible model is great not just for the younger lawyers — it works for the older ones as well, because they have to care for elderly parents.
“It really does increase productivity. You can concentrate when you need to, and if that means you’re working at 1 in the morning, that’s your schedule. Clients know we’ll work hard for them, and everyone in the firm understands how to do that.”
Small firm, big influence
“The founding came first and the leadership came second,” she says of Durie Tangri, her San Francisco–based intellectual property firm. “We were a group of Berkeley alums who had gone to law school together, and thought it’d be really fun to start a firm together.”
After Durie Tangri was born, Durie and her colleagues started “thinking hard about what a law firm in the 2000s should be.” They borrowed ideas from the startup culture that both surrounded them and forged the core of their patent and intellectual property business.
The ability to start from scratch, without the trappings of a legacy firm, gave them options ranging from the decidedly mundane (no paper file room) to a then-unusual law firm office plan (tiny offices to force collaboration).
How the firm was organized, physically and conceptually, became part of its business model.
“I think law firms have a lot to learn from businesses, including how you invest people in an enterprise and get them to think about their careers contextually,” Durie says. “I feel like a lot of lawyers in more conventional firm settings really think about what they’re doing in a relatively siloed way.”
By contrast, she says, “How we felt when we started is partially because we were all longtime friends. There was a stable base there to allow us to think about things in a slightly more exploratory way, and to follow the impulse to do things differently — break the model a little bit.
“That became its own leadership piece.”
There was a learning curve, Durie admits, because the skills that make a great lawyer and the skills of a great leader often seem fundamentally in conflict. A lawyer works to persuade, she says — a jury, a judge, a client — but in pursuit of a decision, rather than a more in-depth analysis.
“At a law firm, you want people to make investments in the firm and in themselves, and figure out how to be the best lawyer they can be. That’s really a much more multi-dimensional thing about the kind of person they want to be, the kind of professional they want to be,” Durie says. “And that requires understanding people’s motivations and desires in a much deeper way.”
Boutique firms like Durie Tangri, which has three dozen lawyers, can offer students an alternative to what some see as a binary choice between private practice and public interest law. Durie, who teaches at Berkeley Law and spends a lot of time with students, says they don’t have to make such a stark choice when smaller firms offer opportunities.
“There are plenty of firms out there, like ours to some extent, where people have made a pretty explicit set of choices and profit maximization isn’t the main driver of their professional life,” Durie says. “You’ve got to interrogate what it is that you want, both in terms of money and what you love to do.”
Parsing the future
“That’s something I think young people should consider,” he says. “I love New York, it’s a fantastic city. But there are other cities that are going to be very important in the future.”
Other lessons are more philosophical. Both Durie and Zuklie say law firms have a lot to learn from entrepreneurs about experimenting with new ideas and collaboration. Teamwork is something they took away from their time at Berkeley Law, and continue to emphasize.
“No one individually leads a law firm — it’s definitely a collection of people,” Zuklie says. “I feel really lucky that I do it with an extraordinary group of folks who are fun to work with every day, trying to do incredibly great work for clients, and trying to leave the organization stronger than when we inherited it.
“The most important skill for a leader is listening. And that’s what we try to do.”